Sofia Helander disputerar den 6 september
2021-07-01
Sofia Helander försvarar sin avhandling From Antagonism to Alienation: Redirecting Radical Democracy den 6 september kl 13:15. Disputationen äger rum i Brusewitzsalen, Östra Ågatan 19, men kommer även att sändas live. Länk till den digitala sändningen hittar du här.

Opponent är docent Mikael Carleheden vid sociologiska institutionen vid Köpenhamns universitet.
Betygsnämndens ledamöter är professor Sharon Rider, filosofiska institutionen, Uppsala universitet, docent Henrik Friberg-Fernros, statsvetenskapliga institutionen, Göteborgs universitet och professor Johan Tralau (ordförande vid disputationen), statsvetenskapliga institutionen, Uppsala universitet.
From Antagonism to Alienation: Redirecting Radical Democracy
Abstract
How can democratic theory address contemporary problems of alienation? Today, alienation manifests itself primarily in processes of precarization and deprofessionalization. When the subject’s work security or professional autonomy is undermined, her relations – not only to others, but also to herself – can become inhibited. This dissertation argues that while alienation poses a serious problem in today’s democracies, it is a form of social suffering that is particularly difficult for democratic theory – preoccupied by the political – to address.
In this dissertation, I seek to address alienation in a radical and open way by taking agonistic democracy as my starting point. Indeed, I assume that a suitable theory of alienation should satisfy two general criteria. On the one hand, it should be radical, engaging with the suffering that people experience in a way that encourages them to contest it. On the other hand, it should be open, avoiding the pitfalls of determinism, human essentialism and the ideal of harmony, all of which risk breeding authoritarianism. In this respect, agonistic democracy seems like the best theory to address alienation. The theory is characterized by its emphasis on transformative social struggle as well as its concern with avoiding what it sees as the authoritarian pitfalls of traditional socialism.
However, while agonistic democracy, preoccupied with the struggle against social marginalization, should be able to address alienation, it cannot. This, I argue, is not merely due to the historical conditions from which it emerges – marked by a turn away from traditional socialist concepts towards a focus on antagonism – but also due to a deeper tension in the theory itself. In its attempts to remain both radical and open, agonistic democracy comes to rely on a subject who is flexible, strong and conflict-seeking. For this reason, it fails to include those who cannot thrive in social disorder, those who are left alienated. I therefore seek to reformulate the subject of agonistic democracy in order to address alienation in an open and radical way.
Ladda ner hela avhandlingen från DiVA (Digitala vetenskapliga arkivet)
Disputationer
-
Sandra Håkansson disputerar 20 oktober
Sandra Håkansson försvarar sin avhandling Politicians under threat: Gender aspects of violence again... -
Jan Szulkin disputerar 16 december
Jan Szulkin försvarar sin avhandling Mobilization or abstention? Economic inequality and labor marke... -
Anton Ahlén disputerar 21 oktober
Anton Ahlén försvarar sin avhandling Managing migration in modern welfare states – Essays on the dev... -
Maximilian S.T. Wanner disputerar 15 september
Maximilian S.T. Wanner försvarar sin avhandling Change and Progress in Disaster Risk Reduction den 1... -
Pernilla Tunberger disputerar 6 maj
Pernilla Tunberger försvarar sin avhandling Earning, caring and the quest for sustainable societies:... -
Maria Nordbrandt Bergström disputerar 14 januari
Maria Nordbrandt Bergström försvarar sin avhandling Modern Talking: On the Democratic Roles of Cross... -
Ariel Young disputerar den 5 november
Ariel Young försvarar sin avhandling Social-Policy Attitudes and the Great Recession: Changes in Per... -
Lutz Gschwind disputerar den 10 september
Lutz Gschwind försvarar sin avhandling Migration and social protection in European welfare states: C... -
Sofia Helander disputerar den 6 september
Sofia Helander försvarar sin avhandling From Antagonism to Alienation: Redirecting Radical Democracy... -
Lauri Peterson disputerar den 8 juni
Lauri Peterson försvarar sin avhandling Investigating the Determinants of International, National an... -
Lars Wikman disputerar den 12 maj
Lars Wikman försvarar sin avhandling Don’t Mention the War: The forging of a domestic foreign policy... -
David Ekstam disputerar den 29 mars
David Ekstam försvarar sin avhandling The socialization of intergroup attitudes: The problem of gene... -
Anton Brännlund disputerar den 8 mars
Anton Brännlund försvarar sin avhandling Wealth and the economic vote. How assets and liabilities sh... -
Anna Ida Rock disputerar den 5 mars
Anna Ida Rock försvarar sin avhandling Statebuilding through diaspora recruitment? - The role of cap... -
Cecilia Josefsson disputerar den 20 november
Cecilia Josefsson försvarar sin avhandling Adaptive resistance: Power struggles over gender quotas i... -
Kristoffer Jutvik disputerar den 13 juni
Kristoffer Jutvik försvarar sin avhandling Governing Migration – On the Emergence and Effects of Pol... -
Nadja Grees disputerar den 10 januari
Nadja Grees försvarar sin avhandling Changing Swedish sickness insurance – policies institutions and... -
Darrel Robinson disputerar 11 oktober
Darrel Robinson försvarar sin avhandling Education and Support for Democracy den 11 oktober kl. 10.0... -
Malin Holm disputerar 14 september
Malin Holm försvarar sin avhandling The Rise of Online Counterpublics? The Limits of Inclusion in a ... -
Michal Smrek disputerar 10 maj
Michal Smrek försvarar sin avhandling Incumbent Renomination: Accountability and Gender Bias den 10 ... -
Lena Noreland disputerar 5 april
Lena Noreland försvarar sin avhandling Laga efter läge. Statsråds föreställningar om styrning i Rege... -
Zohreh Khoban disputerar 8 februari
Zohreh Khoban försvarar sin avhandling Deliberation, against all odds? The critical prospects of min... -
Johan Wejryd disputerar 23 november
Johan Wejryd försvarar sin avhandling On consumed democracy: The Expansion of consumer choice and it... -
Johanna Pettersson disputerar 2 november
Johanna Pettersson försvarar sin avhandling What’s in a Line? Making Sovereignty through Border Poli... -
Marcus Wangel disputerar 5 juni
Marcus Wangel försvarar sin avhandling Deep Roots and Tangled Branches. Bureaucracy and Collaboratio... -
Karin Leijon disputerar 8 juni
Karin Leijon försvarar sin avhandling National Courts as Gatekeepers in European Integration den 8 j... -
Axel Cronert disputerar den 2 februari
Axel Cronert disputerar den 2 februari kl. 13.15 i Brusewitzsalen (Östra Ågatan 19) på avhandlingen ... -
Marcus Östeman disputerar den 15 december
Marcus Österman disputerar den 15 december kl. 13.15 i Brusewitzsalen (Östra Ågatan 19) på avhandlin... -
Charlotta Friedner Parrat disputerar den 7 oktober
Charlotta Friedner Parrat disputerar den 7 oktober kl. 13.15 i Brusewitzsalen (Östra Ågatan 19) på a... -
Frederike Albrecht disputerar 9 juni
Frederike disputerar den 9 juni i Brusewitzsalen kl. 13.15 ... -
Helena Hermansson disputerar 8 juni
Helena Hermansson disputerar 8 juni i Brusewitzsalen kl. 13:15 med avhandlingen "Centralized Disaste... -
Magnus Johnsson disputerar 7 juni
Magnus Johnsson disputerar 7 juni i Brusewitz salen kl. 13.15 med avhandlingen Strategic colonels? T... -
Linda Moberg disputerar 2 juni
Linda Moberg disputerar 2 juni kl. 10.15 i Brusewitz salen, Östra Ågatan 19 med avhandlingen "Market... -
Sara Bondesson disputerar 19 maj
Sara Bondesson disputerar den 19 maj kl. 13.15 i sal 3576, Östra Ågatan 19 med avhandlingen "Vulnera... -
Lina Erikson disputerar 20 maj
Lina Erikson disputerar den 20 maj i sal 3576, Östra Ågatan 19 med avhandlingen "Natural Disasters a... -
Rafael Ahlskog
Rafael Ahlskog disputerar den 24 mars kl. 13.15 i Nya Brusewitz salen, Östra Ågatan 19 med avhandlin...