Karin Leijon defends her thesis 8 June
2018-04-27
Karin Leijon defends her thesis National Courts as Gatekeepers in European Integration on 8 June at 10:15 in Brusewitzsalen (Östra Ågatan 19).

The external reviewer is Professor Daniel Naurin, University of Oslo/University of Gothenburg.
The examiner is Professor Sten Widmalm, Department of Government, Uppsala University. The other members of the examining committee are Senior Lecturer Maria Strömsvik, Department of Political Science, Lund University and Lena Marcusson Senior Professor at the Department of Law, Uppsala University.
The defence will be held in Swedish.
National Courts as Gatekeepers in European Integration
Karin Leijon
The national courts’ placement in the intersection between the EU and member state legal systems makes them important gatekeepers in the process of European integration. In the scholarly debate, national courts are characterized as either supporters of legal integration or as defenders of national sovereignty. The aim of Karin Leijon’s dissertation is to improve our understanding of the national courts’ role as gatekeepers in EU legal integration by shedding new light on the national courts’ aggregated behavioral patterns and the mode of reasoning of individual judges in the preliminary ruling procedure. The dissertation provides a detailed examination of the national courts’ two key choices in the preliminary ruling procedure, both of which have important implications for the scope and pace of legal integration: (1) whether national courts are allowing the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) to decide politically sensitive cases in which national policies are at stake; and (2) whether national courts frame the referred cases by expressing support for an integration-friendly interpretation of the EU law or whether they instead voice an opinion in defense of challenged national law.
The dissertation contributes to redefining the main theoretical controversy on what role national courts play in EU legal integration by identifying previously un-theorized behavior patterns. The analysis demonstrates that national court behavior is not limited to either supporting legal integration or defending national law. On the contrary, national courts frequently make choices that may alleviate parts of the inherent tension between legitimate national concerns and the EU legal obligations that member states must accept in order for the EU to function efficiently. Moreover, Karin Leijon shows that Swedish judges are not reasoning as expected by the dominant theoretical outlook in the judicial politics literature, meaning that they are not primarily guided by the logic of consequentialism and self-regarding preferences when making decisions in the preliminary ruling procedure. Instead, the judges’ mode of reasoning also centers on what constitutes the appropriate course of action given their professional obligations and how their choices may impact various actors and institutions, such as the overall functioning of the preliminary ruling procedure.
Fulltext available for sale on DiVA Open Access
Public Defences
-
Sandra Håkansson defends her thesis on 10 October
Sandra Håkansson defends her thesis Politicians under threat: Gender aspects of violence against pol... -
Jan Szulkin defends his thesis on 16 December
Jan Szulkin defends his thesis Mobilization or abstention? Economic inequality and labor market expe... -
Anton Ahlén defends his thesis on 21 October
Anton Ahlén defends of his thesis Managing migration in modern welfare states – Essays on the develo... -
Maximilian S.T. Wanner defends his thesis on 15 September
Maximilian S.T. Wanner defends his thesis Change and Progress in Disaster Risk Reduction on 15 Septe... -
Pernilla Tunberger defends her thesis on 6 May
Pernilla Tunberger defends her thesis Earning, caring and the quest for sustainable societies: towar... -
Maria Nordbrandt Bergström defends her thesis on 14 January
Maria Nordbrandt Bergström defends her thesis Modern Talking: On the Democratic Roles of Cross-Cutti... -
Ariel Young defends his thesis on 5 November
Ariel Young defends his thesis Social-Policy Attitudes and the Great Recession: Changes in Perceptio... -
Lutz Gschwind defends his thesis on 10 September
Lutz Gschwind defends his thesis Migration and social protection in European welfare states: Cui bon... -
Sofia Helander defends her thesis on 6 September
Sofia Helander defends her thesis From Antagonism to Alienation: Redirecting Radical Democracy on 6 ... -
Lauri Peterson defends his thesis on 8 June
Lauri Peterson defends his thesis Investigating the Determinants of International, National and Loca... -
Lars Wikman defends his thesis on 12 May
Lars Wikman defends his thesis Don’t Mention the War: The forging of a domestic foreign policy conse... -
David Ekstam defends his thesis on 29 March
David Ekstam defends his thesis The socialization of intergroup attitudes: The problem of generation... -
Anton Brännlund defends his thesis on 8 march
Anton Brännlund defends his thesis Wealth and the economic vote. How assets and liabilities shape el... -
Anna Ida Rock defends her thesis 5 March
Anna Ida Rock defends her thesis Statebuilding through diaspora recruitment? - The role of capacity,... -
Cecilia Josefsson defends her thesis 20 November
Cecilia Josefsson defends her thesis Adaptive resistance: Power struggles over gender quotas in Urug... -
Kristoffer Jutvik defends his thesis 13 June
Kristoffer Jutvik defends his thesis 13 June Governing Migration – On the Emergence and Effects of P... -
Nadja Grees defends her thesis 10 January
Nadja Grees defends her thesis Changing Swedish sickness insurance – policies institutions and outco... -
Darrel Robinson defends his thesis 11 October
Darrel Robinson defends his thesis Education and Support for Democracy on 11 October at 10:00 in Ost... -
Malin Holm defends her thesis 14 September
Malin Holm defends her thesis The Rise of Online Counterpublics? The Limits of Inclusion in a Digita... -
Michal Smrek defends his thesis 10 May
Michal Smrek defends his thesis Incumbent Renomination: Accountability and Gender Bias on 10 May at ... -
Lena Noreland defends her thesis 5 April
Lena Noreland defends her thesis Laga efter läge. Statsråds föreställningar om styrning i Regeringsk... -
Zohreh Khoban defends her thesis 8 February
Zohreh Khoban defends her thesis Deliberation, against all odds? The critical prospects of mini-publ... -
Johan Wejryd defends his thesis 23 November
Johan Wejryd defends his thesis On consumed democracy: The Expansion of consumer choice and its impl... -
Johanna Pettersson defends her thesis 2 November
Johanna Pettersson defends her thesis What’s in a Line? Making Sovereignty through Border Policy on ... -
Marcus Wangel defends his thesis 5 June
Marcus Wangel defends his thesis Deep Roots and Tangled Branches. Bureaucracy and Collaboration in N... -
Karin Leijon defends her thesis 8 June
Karin Leijon defends her thesis National Courts as Gatekeepers in European Integration on 8 June at ... -
Axel Cronert defends his thesis on 2 February
Axel Cronert defends his thesis "All Interventionists Now? On the Political Economy of Active Labor ... -
Marcus Österman defends his thesis on 15 December
Marcus Österman defends his thesis "Education, Stratification and Reform: Educational Institutions i... -
Charlotta Friedner Parrat defends her thesis on 7 October
Charlotta Friedner Parrat defends her thesis Change, Institutions, and International Organisations: ... -
Frederike Albrecht disputerar 9 juni
Frederike disputerar den 9 juni i Brusewitzsalen kl. 13.15 ... -
Helena Hermansson disputerar 8 juni
Helena Hermansson disputerar 8 juni i Brusewitzsalen kl. 13:15 med avhandlingen "Centralized Disaste... -
Magnus Johnsson disputerar 7 juni
Magnus Johnsson disputerar 7 juni i Brusewitz salen kl. 13.15 med avhandlingen Strategic colonels? T... -
Linda Moberg disputerar 2 juni
Linda Moberg disputerar 2 juni kl. 10.15 i Brusewitz salen, Östra Ågatan 19 med avhandlingen "Market... -
Sara Bondesson disputerar 19 maj
Sara Bondesson disputerar den 19 maj kl. 13.15 i sal 3576, Östra Ågatan 19 med avhandlingen "Vulnera... -
Lina Erikson disputerar 20 maj
Lina Erikson disputerar den 20 maj i sal 3576, Östra Ågatan 19 med avhandlingen "Natural Disasters a... -
Rafael Ahlskog
Rafael Ahlskog disputerar den 24 mars kl. 13.15 i Nya Brusewitz salen, Östra Ågatan 19 med avhandlin...