Nadja Grees defends her thesis 10 January
2019-12-17
Nadja Grees defends her thesis Changing Swedish sickness insurance – policies institutions and outcomes on 10 January at 13:15 in Brusewitzsalen, Östra Ågatan 19.

The external reviewer is Axel West Pedersen from Velferdsforskningsinstituttet NOVA, Oslo Metropolitan University.
The members of the examining committee are Professor PerOla Öberg, Department of Government, Uppsala University, Associate Professor Helena Stensota, Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg and Professor Jan Ottosson, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University.
CHANGING SWEDISH SICKNESS INSURANCE – POLICIES INSTITUTIONS AND OUTCOMES
The aim of this thesis is to contribute to welfare state theorising by analysing changing risk protection in Swedish sickness insurance and demonstrate how the understanding of such, and its implications, can be enhanced by strategic methodological choices. When analysing formal policy change in the compulsory sickness insurance system, it is concluded that the Swedish system fulfils almost every aspect of a so called social democratic welfare state, and no institutional shift can be discerned over time. When instead studying the interaction between compulsory and occupational benefits, and when investigating differences between diverse groups on the labour market and changes over time, it is demonstrated that there has been an institutional shift in the Swedish system. The balance in regulation between state and collective agreements has moved substantially in the direction of the latter. In terms of the basis for entitlements, a shift from citizenship/residence and labour force participation towards occupational categories has occurred. Considering the replacement levels of the public system, there has also been a shift towards inadequate benefits due to a low ceiling. Such findings emphasise the importance of including occupational systems, and of not treating the population as a homogenous mass, when studying risk protection. When focusing the analysis on how a system functions in practice rather than in theory as is usually done, and thus focusing on non-take-up of occupational benefits, it is shown that a large group of individuals are missing out on the benefit to which they have a right due to their occupational category. Such a fact has implications in terms of risk protection. The most obvious implication of high levels of non-take-up of occupational insurance is reduced individual income security for the affected groups. As the non-take-up is unevenly distributed among groups, such results also indicate that the traditional stratification in the system is strengthened but also that new groups of individuals are worse off than others, thus causing a new basis for stratification within the system.
Public Defences
-
Sandra Håkansson defends her thesis on 10 October
Sandra Håkansson defends her thesis Politicians under threat: Gender aspects of violence against pol... -
Jan Szulkin defends his thesis on 16 December
Jan Szulkin defends his thesis Mobilization or abstention? Economic inequality and labor market expe... -
Anton Ahlén defends his thesis on 21 October
Anton Ahlén defends of his thesis Managing migration in modern welfare states – Essays on the develo... -
Maximilian S.T. Wanner defends his thesis on 15 September
Maximilian S.T. Wanner defends his thesis Change and Progress in Disaster Risk Reduction on 15 Septe... -
Pernilla Tunberger defends her thesis on 6 May
Pernilla Tunberger defends her thesis Earning, caring and the quest for sustainable societies: towar... -
Maria Nordbrandt Bergström defends her thesis on 14 January
Maria Nordbrandt Bergström defends her thesis Modern Talking: On the Democratic Roles of Cross-Cutti... -
Ariel Young defends his thesis on 5 November
Ariel Young defends his thesis Social-Policy Attitudes and the Great Recession: Changes in Perceptio... -
Lutz Gschwind defends his thesis on 10 September
Lutz Gschwind defends his thesis Migration and social protection in European welfare states: Cui bon... -
Sofia Helander defends her thesis on 6 September
Sofia Helander defends her thesis From Antagonism to Alienation: Redirecting Radical Democracy on 6 ... -
Lauri Peterson defends his thesis on 8 June
Lauri Peterson defends his thesis Investigating the Determinants of International, National and Loca... -
Lars Wikman defends his thesis on 12 May
Lars Wikman defends his thesis Don’t Mention the War: The forging of a domestic foreign policy conse... -
David Ekstam defends his thesis on 29 March
David Ekstam defends his thesis The socialization of intergroup attitudes: The problem of generation... -
Anton Brännlund defends his thesis on 8 march
Anton Brännlund defends his thesis Wealth and the economic vote. How assets and liabilities shape el... -
Anna Ida Rock defends her thesis 5 March
Anna Ida Rock defends her thesis Statebuilding through diaspora recruitment? - The role of capacity,... -
Cecilia Josefsson defends her thesis 20 November
Cecilia Josefsson defends her thesis Adaptive resistance: Power struggles over gender quotas in Urug... -
Kristoffer Jutvik defends his thesis 13 June
Kristoffer Jutvik defends his thesis 13 June Governing Migration – On the Emergence and Effects of P... -
Nadja Grees defends her thesis 10 January
Nadja Grees defends her thesis Changing Swedish sickness insurance – policies institutions and outco... -
Darrel Robinson defends his thesis 11 October
Darrel Robinson defends his thesis Education and Support for Democracy on 11 October at 10:00 in Ost... -
Malin Holm defends her thesis 14 September
Malin Holm defends her thesis The Rise of Online Counterpublics? The Limits of Inclusion in a Digita... -
Michal Smrek defends his thesis 10 May
Michal Smrek defends his thesis Incumbent Renomination: Accountability and Gender Bias on 10 May at ... -
Lena Noreland defends her thesis 5 April
Lena Noreland defends her thesis Laga efter läge. Statsråds föreställningar om styrning i Regeringsk... -
Zohreh Khoban defends her thesis 8 February
Zohreh Khoban defends her thesis Deliberation, against all odds? The critical prospects of mini-publ... -
Johan Wejryd defends his thesis 23 November
Johan Wejryd defends his thesis On consumed democracy: The Expansion of consumer choice and its impl... -
Johanna Pettersson defends her thesis 2 November
Johanna Pettersson defends her thesis What’s in a Line? Making Sovereignty through Border Policy on ... -
Marcus Wangel defends his thesis 5 June
Marcus Wangel defends his thesis Deep Roots and Tangled Branches. Bureaucracy and Collaboration in N... -
Karin Leijon defends her thesis 8 June
Karin Leijon defends her thesis National Courts as Gatekeepers in European Integration on 8 June at ... -
Axel Cronert defends his thesis on 2 February
Axel Cronert defends his thesis "All Interventionists Now? On the Political Economy of Active Labor ... -
Marcus Österman defends his thesis on 15 December
Marcus Österman defends his thesis "Education, Stratification and Reform: Educational Institutions i... -
Charlotta Friedner Parrat defends her thesis on 7 October
Charlotta Friedner Parrat defends her thesis Change, Institutions, and International Organisations: ... -
Frederike Albrecht disputerar 9 juni
Frederike disputerar den 9 juni i Brusewitzsalen kl. 13.15 ... -
Helena Hermansson disputerar 8 juni
Helena Hermansson disputerar 8 juni i Brusewitzsalen kl. 13:15 med avhandlingen "Centralized Disaste... -
Magnus Johnsson disputerar 7 juni
Magnus Johnsson disputerar 7 juni i Brusewitz salen kl. 13.15 med avhandlingen Strategic colonels? T... -
Linda Moberg disputerar 2 juni
Linda Moberg disputerar 2 juni kl. 10.15 i Brusewitz salen, Östra Ågatan 19 med avhandlingen "Market... -
Sara Bondesson disputerar 19 maj
Sara Bondesson disputerar den 19 maj kl. 13.15 i sal 3576, Östra Ågatan 19 med avhandlingen "Vulnera... -
Lina Erikson disputerar 20 maj
Lina Erikson disputerar den 20 maj i sal 3576, Östra Ågatan 19 med avhandlingen "Natural Disasters a... -
Rafael Ahlskog
Rafael Ahlskog disputerar den 24 mars kl. 13.15 i Nya Brusewitz salen, Östra Ågatan 19 med avhandlin...